โ All campaigns
1 platform
Guild Case Study
Posts as
+ New messageIn review
All 1 versions decided โ finalize the review to route it.
Reviewers:none yetReviewers open the link and identify by email (top-right).
BasicOpsยท link a task, share the preview, post a review summary
Approved
0 / 1
posts ready
Changes requested1
Guild Case Study
Brief ยท Use this copy as is.
What if your AI agents worked like the rest of your team, instead of living in a side chat window?
Our CRO, Justin Oberbauer, started tinkering with agents and hit the wall anyone running a few of them knows: juggling agents in one long chat gets messy fast. So he tried something simple. He gave an agent its own seat in BasicOps, with a name and a role, and let it pick up tasks like any team member. It drafted documents, saved them to Drive, and linked them back to the work.
That experiment became a core idea for us: agents are team members, not tools or widgets with one defined outcome. Each one gets a name, a role, and a real seat, and works where the team already works, with a person in control.
BasicOps stays builder-neutral. We are the shared workplacewhere humans and agents work together, and the agents come from platforms like Guild, which made setup the easiest of any we tried.
Thanks to the Guild team for the writeup on how it came together. Read it here: https://www.guild.ai/blog/customer-stories/basicops-case-study
Curious what agents on your team could look like? See it at basicops.com.
#AIagents #FutureOfWork #Collaboration
Image ยท all platforms

Replace image on all platforms
New message