Reddit post
· Case Study RepostWe gave an AI agent its own seat on the team instead of a chat window—here's what happened
What if your AI agents worked like the rest of your team, instead of living in a side chat window? Our CRO, Justin Oberbauer, started tinkering with agents and hit the wall anyone running a few of them knows: juggling agents in one long chat gets messy fast. So he tried something simple. He gave an agent its own seat in BasicOps, with a name and a role, and let it pick up tasks like any team member. It drafted documents, saved them to Drive, and linked them back to the work. That experiment became a core idea for us: agents are team members, not tools or widgets with one defined outcome. Each one gets a name, a role, and a real seat, and works where the team already works, with a person in control. BasicOps stays builder-neutral. We're the shared workplace where humans and agents work together, and the agents come from platforms like Guild, which made setup the easiest of any we tried. The Guild team wrote up how it came together if you want the details: https://www.guild.ai/blog/customer-stories/basicops-case-study Curious what folks here think—does treating agents as named teammates with real roles make more sense than the one-big-chat approach? What's worked (or broken) for you? You can see what we built at basicops.com.
Select any text in the copy to start a thread.