← Guild.ai
YouTube post
· Case Study RepostVideo title max 100 chars. Description folds at ~157 chars. Requires a thumbnail/video.
Post copy
What if your AI agents worked like the rest of your team, instead of living in a side chat window?
Our CRO, Justin Oberbauer, started tinkering with agents and hit the wall anyone running a few of them knows: juggling agents in one long chat gets messy fast. So he tried something simple. He gave an agent its own seat in BasicOps, with a name and a role, and let it pick up tasks like any team member. It drafted documents, saved them to Drive, and linked them back to the work.
That experiment became a core idea for us: agents are team members, not tools or widgets with one defined outcome. Each one gets a name, a role, and a real seat, and works where the team already works, with a person in control.
BasicOps stays builder-neutral. We are the shared workplace where humans and agents work together, and the agents come from platforms like Guild, which made setup the easiest of any we tried.
Thanks to the Guild team for the writeup on how it came together. Read it here: https://www.guild.ai/blog/customer-stories/basicops-case-study
Curious what agents on your team could look like? See it at basicops.com.
#AIagents #FutureOfWork #Collaboration
1,161 / 5,000
Link URL (optional)
Media 1 / 1
💬 Revise with Claude
Live preview
10:24AI Agents as Team Members, Not Chat Widgets | BasicOps + Guild
BasicOps · 1.1K subscribers
2.1K views · 1 hour ago
What if your AI agents worked like the rest of your team, instead of living in a side chat window? Our CRO, Justin Oberbauer, started tinkering with agents
Post manually
Review
0 open threads
No comments yet.
Select any text in the copy to start a thread.
Select any text in the copy to start a thread.